The Artist is Present

When first told about Marina Abramović’s performance The Artist is Present, to be honest I really didn’t think much of it. So she sits in front of someone for a while, is being present really that hard? It wasn’t till experiencing just a slice of this performance I realised I was completely wrong.

Not really knowing the person I was sat opposite to, at first I felt rather embarrassed and exposed. But after a while as I noticed our breathing become in time, I began to feel a special intimacy with the girl sat opposite me. In a way, it’s not something I can describe. There was just something special about us both being ‘present’ in the moment together. Unfortunately, this happened for only a few moments throughout the hour or so we sat across from each other, as staying ‘present’ in the moment proven to be more difficult than I initially thought.

Constantly my mind would wander off, thinking about my next seminar or did I lock the door when I left my flat, consequently my focus would go and those moments were lost. I couldn’t believe Marina did this for eight hours a day and didn’t lose focus.

What I admired most about Marina’s piece was the bond that was created between two people, which was essentially an oxymoron. The moment seemed to contain so much meaning yet at the same time didn’t, as it wasn’t going to go any further and when the person left Marina they were again just strangers. This idea interested me a lot and it made me ask the question:

Can you create a meaningful encounter with a complete stranger?

This question is something I would really like to explore throughout this module.

Posted in Leanne Mckettrick, Research | Comments Off on The Artist is Present

The Lovers: The Great Wall Walk

Marin Abramović is a very dedicated performance artist whose work consists of The Artist is present and Nightsea Crossing. However, it was her performance of The Lovers: The Great Wall Walk, which caught my attention the most. She collaborated on this piece with F. Uwe Laysiepen (Ulay), who she was in a relationship with, in 1988. It was an endurance piece that lasted 90 days. It consisted of her starting at one end of The Great Wall of China and Ulay starting at the other end. They walked the length of the wall towards each other and then met in the middle. In the book Marina Abramović, Mary Richards states that “Ulay began his walk to the west (dry, heat) at Jao Yu Guan, which is on the south-western edge of the Gobi Desert, while Abramović started at Shanhaiguan by the Yellow Sea in the east (damp, cold) an area known as the dragon’s head’’  (2010, p. 99). It was a very symbolic piece as the walk was originally supposed to end with their marriage after their reunion in the middle of the wall. However, by the time they got permission to do this performance they decided to end their relationship. The reason that I like this piece so much is that I think it is tragically poetic. Throughout the process, of creating and performing this piece, different intimacy levels would have been experienced between Marina and Ulay. At the beginning (when the performance was supposed to end in their marriage) they had the kind of intimacy that lovers share. However, by the end of it they parted. This was still done with an affectionate hug but the intimacy that they had originally experienced with one another had changed to something less substantial. When reviewing this piece, Holland Cotter stated that:

The stage for their final performance, in 1988, was the Great Wall of China. Starting from opposite ends of the wall, they walked toward each other for three months. Originally the meeting was to have been the occasion for their marriage; in the event it marked their break-up. (2010).

Works Cited

Cotter, Holland (2010) Performance Art Preserved, in the Flesh. Online: www.nytimes.com/2010/03/12/arts/design/12abromovic.html?pagewanted=all (accessed 21 October 2012).

Richards, Mary (2010) Marina Abramović, Abingdon: Routledge.

Posted in Jessica Smith, Research | 1 Comment

Whisper

Our responses to Proto-type Theater’s Whisper

Jessica Smith’s Response

Whisper consists of three performers on stage behind a back lit screen so they are shown as silhouettes. The story is narrated by each of them through headphones, which the audience members are wearing. Peter S. Petralia, the writer and director of Whisper, states that:

In order to create Whisper I researched how sound is received and processed by the brain so that I could manipulate the stimulus being sent to the audience, to create layered sensory effects that might sometimes trick the perceptive facilities of the audience/receiver. This tricking manifested itself most notably in the moments when sound was tuned into a single audio channel (which naturally leads the eye to look to the corresponding side of the stage) and the visual on the corresponding side was either completely obfuscated or incongruous with the sound being heard (2010, p.99).

This performance seemed truly powerful to me as I had never experienced anything like it before. The way it created a feeling of isolation made me feel like I was the only person watching it and their use of second person dialogue made me feel like they were talking directly to me, like what I was seeing was some sort of surreal dream I was having about my life. This then made it seem as if I was a part of the performance and like I was involved. Whisper has made us consider the use of headphones in our own work. We believe that headphones would create a greater impact on the speech we use and would leave a larger impression on our audience.

Demi Morrison’s Response

Watching Proto-type Theater’s Whisper, I was inspired personally by the use of headphones in performance and the ways in which the performance was framed on stage. The gauze across the front of the space was used to create shadows with back lighting so the spectators were unable to see details and faces, just shadows. The effect of listening to the performance with headphones, evoked sense of isolation for me and I felt that I was the only person watching the performance. I was very interested in working with headphones in our performance as I felt that it is way to distance the speech from the action and gives more meaning to any dialogue. However I do understand that this may not be possible as we may end up having a final performance that is not compatible with the use of headphones.

“Proto-type is currently exploring the distributed narrative, city as source/cite, the relationship between technology and intimacy, the sung-through format of music theatre and the nature of love and death” (Proto-type Theater, 2012). This is what Proto-type have written as part of their mission statement, and it is evident from viewing Whisper that this is true and the company have explored the ideas in depth. Whisper was devised whilst the company was in Glasgow, hence the use of the city as a source. With the use of technology in relation to intimacy; I personally felt that the use of headphones do create a notion of intimacy for the spectator.

Work Cited

Petralia, Peter Salvatore (2010) ‘Headspace: Architectural Space in the Brain’, Contemporary Theatre Review, 20: 1, 96-108.

Proto-type Theater, (2012) The Company  Online: http://proto-type.org/category/company/ (accessed on 15th October 2012)

Posted in Demi Morrison, Jessica Smith, Research | Comments Off on Whisper

Franko B: Impressions and Context

Franko B is a performance artist who we were all very interested in, below our responses to his work.

Demi Morrison’s Response:

Continuing on from the question ‘how to make the audience feel uncomfortable?’ in my first post, I have looked at a performance artist, Franko B, who creates work that can make the spectator feel uncomfortable. The one piece of his that sticks in my mind it titled I Miss You (2003) and if you scroll down, you can watch the video.

Franko B violates his own body in this piece, cutting himself and walking along a catwalk bleeding onto the stage. To me the idea that an audience would be prepared to watch this and not offer assistance as a man is bleeding before their eyes was inhumane. However, after watching the performance, I will admit that I was captivated and drawn in. I can only imagine how powerful this feeling is when watching him live.

“I’m essentially a painter who also works in performance. I come from a visual art background and not “live art” or theatre, and this is very important to me as it informs the way my work is read. In the last 20 years or so I have developed ways of working to suit my need at that particular time, in terms of strategy and context, by using, installation, sculpture, video and sound.” (Franko B, 2008)

This highlights why this artist is the person he is today and why he creates the art he does. Not only has he developed a style of working, he also has a cause. His work is also a way for him to explore the politics behind performance. It is evident that this artist uses his life experience as his inspiration, or so I believe, and this is somebody I endeavor to aspire to.

The idea of a performance body artist is one that appeals to me. Essentially, I would like to create a piece of CEP that uses the body in a certain way to assist in answering the key questions posed by the performance. 

 Jessica Smith’s Response:

While doing research for this module I discovered an artist called Franko B. When I first heard about his I Miss You piece I felt truly disgusted. I did not understand how somebody cutting their wrists and walking up and down a catwalk, while blood dripped onto it, could be considered as a performance. However, after viewing I Miss You I came to understand that a performance is not just what the artist does, but how they frame their work. The way in which a performance is staged gives a greater effect. This performance starts off in blackness and as the lights flicker on, the audience, sat either side of the catwalk, can see a naked man painted white. Everything that he does adds to the artistic content. From the way, in which he walks, to the way that the light, reflected onto his white figure, makes him seem as though he is in a negative picture format (the setting on a camera). In a review, Elizabeth Schwyzer analyses his piece:

Using his body as his canvas and likening his blood to oil paint, the Italian-born artist has honed his ability to evoke deep emotional, psychological, and physiological responses in his viewers. Though he’s best known for bleeding in public, B’s primary interest is in making an immediate impact on his audience. (Schwyzer, 2007)

 Leanne McKetterick’s Response:

Through our first seminars of this module, I have now come to an understanding of the idea that anything can be a performance. But what challenged me now, was the notion of what is it that makes whatever we see or are watching, a performance?

In this book The Empty Space, Peter Brook states, “I can take any empty space and call it a bare stage. A man walks across this empty space whilst someone else is watching him, and this is all that is needed for an act of theatre to be engaged” (2008, p.11). What Brook suggests here, is that by giving something the frame of ‘this is theatre’; is what contextualises it.
Imagine walking down the street and seeing a man naked with his wrists cut and his blood dripping on to the pavement. What would you do? Most people would probably try to help him and call an ambulance. Yet, many people pay money to see the artist Franko B do the exact same thing and simply just stand and watch. This is purely because of the context in which the man’s act is in.

This idea of context interests me a lot when it comes to our performance. I’m interested in exploring how putting something in the context of being on the stage or in front of an audience can change how we and the audience perceive it.

 

Works Cited

Brooks, Peter (2008) The Empty Space. Penguin Books Ltd: London

Franko B, 2008, The Franko B Archive. Online: http://www.bris.ac.uk/theatrecollection/liveart/liveart_FrankoB.html> (accessed on 14th October 2012)

Schwyzer, Elizabeth (2007) Santa Barbara Independent: I Am the Medium Brings Live Art to UCSB, Online: http://www.independent.com/news/2007/oct/25/emi-am-mediumem-brings-live-art-ucsb/(accessed on 14 October 2012)

Posted in Demi Morrison, Jessica Smith, Leanne Mckettrick, Research | Comments Off on Franko B: Impressions and Context

What Is Contemporary Experimental Performance?

After looking at what is performance itself, I felt it necessary to look into ‘what is CEP?’. I decided to do some continuous writing on the subject with different headings in relation to CEP. This is what I got:

Contemporary:
This is something that is modern. It’s new and unexpected to the viewers. There is or can be no performance that has been similar or is this same. It is the idea of postmodern and the way the world looks at society and culture in the 21st century. Contemporary makes me this of the idea of something being ‘edgy’ and being in the present. There is no past.

Experimental:
Taking risks. Exploring boundaries. Knowing no fear. These are all ideas that I personally associate with the idea of something being experimental. It should be something new. Something raw that, in the sense of performance, is novel to the audience/spectator. Experimental comes from some experience from the past that one decides to explore and/or recreate thus, experimenting with it.

Performance:
In terms of performance, before beginning this module, I would have said that a performance is a show that depicts something from history most likely. In terms of drama, I would have said a performance is a person/ensemble acting on a stage from premeditated material. Now, I see performance as whatever I want it to be. Just writing this post is a performance. Living is a performance. This suggests that a performance knows no boundaries, has no limitations and can be whatever the performer wants it to be.

After collating all of these ideas, I began to feel like I had a better understanding in what CEP actually is and where, as a performer, I could take it? This answer to that being: wherever I want to. CEP doesn’t even have to be secluded to a room or a space or a stage. It can be digital or it could exist online. The options are limitless.

After thinking more about the idea of defining CEP I began to question myself and whether you can define it.

Is it worthless even trying to define this term?

Is there a specific definition which will include everything possible?

I’m not sure. I do not believe that something a widely open as the term CEP can be defined specifically or even catgorised as there are no boundaries or limits to base this on.

Posted in Demi Morrison, Research | Comments Off on What Is Contemporary Experimental Performance?